Saturday, April 28, 2012


A Pacific Humpback Whale calf.

A baleen whale carcass, at a depth of 9800 ft, on the floor of Monterey Canyon.

The deep ocean floor (greater  9800 ft deep) is an inhospitable place of cold (36F), great pressure (4400 pounds/in2), and permanent, absolute, unrelenting darkness. The earth’s surface, including the sea floor, is composed of a series of large, mobile plates. It wasn’t until 1977 that marine geologists discovered hydrothermal vents, sites where plates are moving apart on the ocean floor and water heated by magma, surges out of the crust at temperatures as high as 870oF and as acidic as vinegar. The heated water comes spewing out as black or white smokers.

At a vent resort vestimentiferan worms enjoy the good life as two black smokers eject 800F water.

In contrast to most of the deep sea floor, vent systems have diverse and abundant life.  This diversity of vent life is even more amazing because it occurs in darkness. Most ecosystems depend on sunlight, converted to biomass through photosynthesis, as the source of energy that drives the system.  But light only penetrates a few hundred feet in the ocean.  So without light, and therefore without photosynthesis, how do the vent communities survive, much less prosper?

My  molecular biologist / bio-chemist son has drummed into me that almost everything starts with and ultimately depends on microbes.  The hydrothermal vents are no exceptions.  The super heated water is rich in sulphur and other dissolved minerals. Archaean bacteria specialize in metabolizing those minerals and converting them to energy, a chemical analog of phontosynthesis known as chemoauthotrophy That abundance of those microcorganisms forms the basis for the food web and animal communities that live in the vent ecosystems.  

Thousands of white vent crabs exemplify the abundance of life found around vents, these in the Antarctic Ocean.
How rich is life at the vent systems?  In spite of the difficulty of visiting these sites and the problem of trying to sample life forms at such great depths, a new species of vent life has been named in the scientific literature every two weeks since the first paper in 1979. 

However, the volcanic activity on the sea floor is not consistent long term and can turn off in some areas and appear in others further away.  So the animals living at the vents must be able to get around, maybe great distances.  Many vent organism are sessile and cannot move and many others cannot mover great distances.  Besides, leaving the area of the vent means traveling from a warm area into the frigid cold.  For many animals it’s the larvae, rather than adults, that are carried far away by currents and hopefully land in a favorable spot of the deep sea floor.

During a deep sea dive in 1987, researchers accidentally came across the skeleton of a blue or fin whale in the Santa Catalina Deep.  This was the first whale carcass to be observed on the deep sea floor. What was remarkable was the large number of organism living on the carcass, many of which were not seen elsewhere on that sea floor, although a number of them were known from vent communities elsewhere.  Mats of  chemoautotrohphic bacteria covered the seafloor and bones and other species present host such bacteria internally and live off the energy released by the bacteria. What had been discovered was a chemoautotrophic community like those of the vent communities, living on a dead whale.

Although there were no hydrothermal vents at the whale site, the bacteria were performing their miracle by metabolizing the fats in the whale bones!  Since that time other natural deep sea whale fall occurrences have been found, but those discoveries are dependent upon luck.  To better understand decomposition of whales and their utilization a number of whale carcasses have been sunk to the sea floor and their exact location recorded so they can become subjects for long term studies.  This is now a rich field of study and has revealed much about the ecology of the deep sea floor.

Snacking at the Cafe Cetacea. Multi-colored bacterial mats metabolize bone fats (top left), hagfish consume soft tissue (top right), bone-eating worms feast on the skeleton (bottom left) and vent crabs do general clean up (bottom right).

Some food falls to the deep sea floor from higher in the water column, but at a very slow rate, and has been names “marine snow”. Much of it is small to microscopic. A 40 ton whale carcass sinking to that sea floor provides the equivalent of 200 years worth of food from marine snow.  And whale arrives as single, all be it very large, package --- and the largest cetacean, the blue whale, reaches a greater weight of 200 tons!  Although several stages of decomposition  of the carcass can be identified, the longest lived stage is that of the vent community organisms  that colonize and consume the bone lipids. This community includes certain bacteria, as well as specific groups of crabs and other crustaceans, clams, snails, worms, and others. Some species occur in the tens of thousands of individuals.  Given that the bones of large whales can be 60% lipid by weight and the cold temperature in deep water, large whale skeletons may last more than 50 years on the sea floor.

These whale skeletons thus serve as a way station of sorts, where deep sea communities can grow  and ultimately send their larvae on to colonize other shale carcasses or real hydrothermal vents on the sea floor.  Some estimates place whale carcasses, at least along whale migration routes, as close together as 6 miles. So the death of these air breathing giants provide crucial food and colonization sites for some of the most specialized deep sea organism in the ocean.


Whenever I read about an interesting biological phenomenon, like our tale of the whale, I often wonder how far back in time the phenomenon originated.  Fortunately, the fossil record can often provide some insight and constraints.

The earliest whales evolve from terrestrial ungulate mammals by the Eocene, some 40 million years ago.  These are predatory, primitive whales achieve lengths of 50 feet or more.  However, the bone structure of these whales shows that they had not yet evolved the high oil content in their bones.  So it is not too surprising that no vent community type fossils are known from those fossil skeletons.  It is not until the Miocene, about 11-15 million years ago, that whale fossils with associated invertebrate fossil characteristics of vent communities first appear, when the bone oil content  reaches critical mass.

What of the fossil record of vent communities?  Hydrothermal vents on the sea floor occur far back in time, billions of years, even before life first evolved.  More than 50 fossil hydrothermal vents with an associated fossilized communities are known, extending as far back as the Cambrian in China, some 522 million years ago.

I can’t manage to drag dinosaurs into this post.  Although dinosaurs were the dominant large land dwelling vertebrates of the Mesozoic, and took their phenomenal success to the air when small maniraptoran theropods evolved into birds, they never evolved into aquatic or marine forms.  That’s not to say that dinosaurs aren’t found in marine rocks.  Hadrosaurs, ankylosaurs, and therzinosauroids have all been recovered from marine environments and some even laid on the sea floor long enough to have oysters begin to grow on their bones.  However, all these occurrences are of terrestrial dinosaurs whose carcasses floated out to sea, either from the shoreline or carried out by a river.  While they came to rest on the sea floor, they did not live in the ocean.  Having normal bones with low fat content, it is no surprise that vent community organisms have never been found on one of those skeletons.

Although dinosaurs never invaded the fresh and salt water realms, other groups of Mesozoic reptiles did, and some achieved large size. Ichthyosaurs, reptiles resembling  dolphins and porpoises,  grew quite large (up to 70 feet in length) and some were deep diving predators.  Mosasaurs are ocean-going predatory marine lizards, related to the Komodo dragon, the largest of which achieved a length of 57 feet (17.5m).  The plesiosaurs are the final large group of predatory Mesozoic marine reptiles and reached 20 m (? Ft) in length.  Certainly the largest members of each of these groups would be a tremendous food packet when a carcasses fell to the sea floor, just like a whale, and several paleontologists have speculated on the ecological effects of such events. 

The largest known Mesozoic marine reptiles compared to a sperm whale and a scuba diver.  
In 2008 a paper appeared providing the first documentation of a Mesozoic marine reptile with fossil remains of a chemoautotrophic community preserved in intimate association with a skeleton --- in fact two such skeletons of plesiosaurs.  Although one cannot directly measure the oil content of these ancient bones, the abundance of iron sulfide inside the plesiosaur bones is evidence of bacterial sulfate reduction of bone lipids. Numerous snails and clams among the bones of the skeletons belong to groups that occur at modern day and fossil hydrothermal vents.

Part of a Cretaceous plesiosaur reptile skeleton from Japan, with vent community snails (yellow circles) and clams (blue circles) organisms preserved between the bones.

A collection of fossil snails from the plesiosaur skeleton.
 Many of the snails and other fossils associated with these plesiosaur skeletons are small and the authors make the point that future Mesozoic marine reptile skeletons need to be carefully prepared with an eye to documenting and preserving any associated invertebrate fossil.  There is the possibility that in the past vent fossils associated with plesiosaur, ichthyosaur, and mosasaur skeletons may have been overlooked or prepared away in the effort to extract the fossil bones from matrix.  I suspect that future work will reveal more vent/reptile fossil associations and show that at least some of those ocean going giant reptiles were the whale falls of the Mesozoic.


Sometimes putting together a Land of the Dead post is pretty straightforward, at other times less so. I have been following research on hydrothermal vent communities pretty much since their discovery.  Not that I read every scientific paper on the subject, far from it, but I do have enough of a fascination with them that I’ve put visiting a deep-sea hydrothermal vent community on my “bucket list”.  And I remember when the discovery of hydrothermal vent communities on whales fall was first announced. 

A number of weeks ago I watched Into The Deep, an episode of the PBS series American   Experience, about the history of sperm whale hunting out of Nantucket Island and the sinking of the whaling ship Essex in 1820 after being “stove by a whale” in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. I knew very little about that part of American History, so it was eye opening. Following that I listened to Philbrick’s In The Heart Of The Sea, a magnificent book about the Essex disaster, and one I highly recommend as a most remarkable, and long forgotten, story of extreme survival at sea.  That led to Dolin’s Leviathan, a history of North American whaling from 17th through 19th centuries.   Leviathan begat my current reading project, Whitehead’s  Sperm Whales: Social Evolution in the Ocean, a remarkable overview of the biology of a most remarkable animal.

Somewhere in all of this I got the idea for a post about whale falls past and present which led me to the work of marine biologists Smith, Baco, Kiel, Higgs, and others. Researching  the paleontological record of whale falls, ancient marine reptiles, and associated fossil vent communities led to the work of Hogler, Kiam, Martill, and others. Those who know me will recognize the behavior exhibited here. “Dan’s got a new favorite” is how it was once described.

When I finish Whitehead’s book it will be time to move on to some other topic. However, the circuitous path for the whale fall post is a manifestation of what the Nobel Prize winning theoretical physicist Richard Feynman described as “the joy of finding things out.”  Coming across a small fact can lead you to learn about a fascinating area about which you knew little about ---- if you are willing to follow your nose.  Nose following is probably preferable to chasing one’s tail, although I will need to check with Nut and Buster, my two resident experts on such matters, to get a professional opinion. 

And no, I haven’t read Moby Dick!!



Dolin, E.J. 2008. Leviathan: The History of Whaling in America. W.W. Norton and Co.: 512 pp.

Goedert, J.L, Squires, R.L., and Barnes, L.G. 1995. Paleoecology of whale-fall habitats from deepwater Oligocene rocks, Olympic Peninsula, Washington State. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 118: 151-158.

Goffredi, S.K., Paull, C.K., Fulton-Bennett, K., Hurtado, and Vrijenhoek, R.C. 2004. Unusual benthic fauna associated with a whale fall in Monterey Canyon, California.  Deep-Sea Research 51: 1295-1306.

Higgs, N.D., Little, C.T.S., and Grover, A.G. 2011.  Bones as biofuels: a review of whale bone composition and implications for deep-sea biology and palaeoanthropology.  Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278: 9-17.

Hogler, J.A. 1994. Speculations on the role of marine reptile deadfalls in Mesozoic deep-sea paleoecology. Palaios 9: 42-47.

Kaim, A., Kobayashi, Y., Echizenya, H., Jenkins, R.G., and Tanabe, K. 2008. Chemosynthetic-based associations on Cretaceous plesiosaurid carcasses. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53(1): 97-104.

Kiel, S. and Goedert, J.L. 2006. Deep-sea bonanzas: early Cenozoic whale-fall communities resemble wood-fall rather than seep communities.  Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 2625-2632..

Martill, D.M., Cruickshank, A.R.I., and Taylor, M.A. 1991. Dispersal via whale bones. Nature 351: 193.

Philbrick, N. 2001. In the Heart of the Sea: The Tragedy of the Whaleship Essex.  Penguin: 302 pp.

Pyenson, N.D. and Haasl, D.M. 2007. Miocene whale-fall from California demonstrates that cetacean size did not determine the evolution of modern whale-fall communities. Biology Letters, Royal Society London 3: 709-711.

Smith, C.R. and Baco, A.R. 2003. Ecology of whale falls at the deep-sea floor.  Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 41: 311-354.

Smith, C.R., Kukert, H., Wheatcroft, R.A., Jumars, P.A., and Deming, J.W. 1989. Vent fauna on whale remains.  Nature 341: 27-28.

Wang, X.Q., Shi, X.Y., Jiang, G.Q., and Zhang, W. 2012. New U-Pb age from the basal Niutitand Formation in South China: implications for diachronous development and condensation of stratigraphic units across the Yangtze platform  at the Ediacaran-Cambrian  transition. Journal of Asian earth Sciences 48: 1-8.

Whitehead, H.   2003. Sperm Whales: Social Evolution in the Ocean. University of Chicago Press: 464 pp.

Monday, April 2, 2012

UPDATE: The Dancing Worm of Turkana

Since yesterday's post on Tullimonstrum gregarium, a copy of Rory's 1969 27 page booklet "The Dancing Worm of Turkana" has come into my possession. For those  interested in a pdf of this work, please email me via the View My Complete Profile link on the right side of this page.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

LIVING FOSSILS: Tullimonstrum gregarium and The Dancing Worm of Turkana

The tully monster is a truly weird fossil, so much so that I want to make it clear up front that I have not concocted this animal as part of an April Fool’s joke. Specimens range in size from 3 to 15 inches (8-35 cm).  It is soft bodied, with no external hard parts. The elongate shape can be divided into three regions.  The blunt tail end bears fins on each side.  The head region has an elongate proboscis that terminates in a pair of jaws with eight small sharp “teeth”.  The trunk is segmented and bears a bar shaped structure that projects sideways.  Each end of the bar is expanded and pigmented.  These expansions are apparently eyes. Although this animal looks most like something from a cheap 1960s Japanese scifi flick, the anatomy is well understood, as literally thousands of its fossils have been found. 

Above and blow: A scientist's view of the Tullimonstrum.

A model of Tullimonstrum, showing the creature's peculiar shape and details of the toothed proboscis.

The first specimens were discovered in 1958 by amateur fossil collector Francis Tully of Lockport Illinois who brought them to the Field Museum of Natural History where they came to the attention of the famous Curator of Fossil Invertebrates Eugene Richardson. Richardson wrote or co-authored the first scientific publications on it. Tully’s role in the discovery of this strange antiquarian beast was recognized in its name Tullimonstrum (Tully’s monster).  The species name gregarium means “common” and refers to the abundance of specimens of it. Ironically, “tull” means “nonsense” in Norwegian --- also an apt description. Eventually it became the state fossil of Illinois.

Amateur fossil collector Francis Tully and and a fine complete specimen of his monster.
Tullimonstrum was a free-swimming predator of the open ocean. In spite of its abundant fossil record its evolutionary relationships are poorly understood. Although similarities to a variety of marine invertebrate groups has been suggested, none of these ideas are very well supported and the creature’s evolutionary position remains a mystery.  

So far this was an interesting scientific story --- an enigmatic but abundant fossil species with very, very peculiar morphology and unknown evolutionary relationships --- just the kind of fossil that intrigues and puzzles paleontologists.  However Tullimonstrum would soon move beyond the pages of dry, scientific journals.

In July 1966 Richardson wrote a popular account of the Tully monster and his research on it.  This included a cover illustration of restored Tullimonstrum swimming and feeding in the ancient Pennsylvanian sea of Illinois.  The story was picked up by the press and got wide circulation in newspapers, including the East African Standard of the former British Colonies of East Africa.

In September of 1966 Richardson received a letter from R.G.I. Cloudesley (a retired Lieutenant–Colonel of the Kings African Rifles) then living in Nairobi, Kenya. Cloudesley recounted that 40 years previously he had had been told by a Mr. A.M.A Champion (then District Commander of Turkana and a skilled naturalist) about an unusual giant worm that lived in the lakes of the area. Champion had heard about this creature from local Africans but had never been able to actually obtain a specimen. Cloudesley remembered the worm as having “paddles and a long snout” so that when he read the news stories about the Tullimonstrum he thought it wise to pass this information on to Richardson in case there was call to follow up on it.

As Richardson was preparing a reply to Cloudesley a letter arrived from a Mr. Purshottan S. Patel of Kenya reporting that something like the Tullimonstrum might be living in Turkana, at least based on stories he had been told by  relatives of a dancing worm in the lakes. Excited, Richardson began researching what was known about the animal life in these areas.  Turns out they were poorly explored and documented areas of the Earth and such an animal might yet well dwell there undiscovered by scientists.

Next Richardson get a letter from an intermediate school teacher from Nakuru, a Mr. Joseph A. Ngomo, who said that his class had read the Sunday Standard that carried the Tullimonstrum story and several students told him they had heard of such a worm from their fathers.  Ngomo included a note from Akai (son of Ekechalon) who recounted, in child’s writing that the worms, swim and “wave hands” during the full moon, and have a bite fatal to humans.

By this point discussions started up at the Field Museum amongst Richardson and other staff that, given the anecdotal but intriguing reports, an expedition might be warranted.  Finding a living relative of the Tullimonstrum would be a really important scientific discovery. The museum published a note in the Newsletter of the East African Natural History Association, hoping more information might be obtained, but there were no responses.  That was not too surprising given how little biological scientific work had been done in those remote areas. Local myths and folklore sometimes prove to be true.    

Early the following year the museum was visited by Dr. Bryan Patterson, a famous paleontologist who studied fossil mammals.  Patterson had been the Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology at the Field Museum but was now a professor at Harvard University. Patterson had just returned from field work in Kenya and happened to know Patel’s uncle. He considered him a bit of a rascal.  Richardson told Patterson of the Tullimonstrum and showed the various letters to him.  Patterson read them with amusement and confessed he had never heard of the dancing worms.   

Later it came to light that Patterson had many reasons to be amused because Cloudesley, Ngomo, Patel, and Akai turned out to be all the same person ---- none other than the illustrious Bryan Patterson.  Of the ten people in the Field Museum who had been hoodwinked only one was in on Patterson’ little prank. That prevented it from going too far and causing professional or institutional embarrassment, after all Patterson was running this from the other side of the globe and couldn’t keep track of how the prank was progressing. It was a clever joke that played on the desires, hopes, and scientific passions of all involved.  He was giving the Field Museum what they wanted --- living relatives of the Tullimonstrum.   If the fossil wasn’t so perplexing and problematic it wouldn’t have been so alluring.

The illustrious Bryan Patterson and the illusive Dancing Worm of Turkana.
One last bit to the story.  Richardson received a Christmas letter in 1968  that on the front carried a photo of Bryan Patterson in full African field regalia holding a rifle in his right and  and hanging from his left hand a recently shot good sized Tullimonstrum, with the proboscis and horizontal bar clearly visible.  Inside was a poem and under the phrase "The End of the Hunt" were the signatures of Cloudsley, Ngomo, Patel, and Akai!

The staff took the leg pulling in good humor and admitted they had been had by a professional. Several years later Richardson even wrote a short book, under another name, about the Dancing Worms of Turkana.  Edward Nash, the editor of the Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural History wrote an account of the whole story and admitted being taken in by it.  He included a copy of the hunting photo as well as the inside of the card with the Kenyan signatures.  He also reproduces in full, all the letters from Kenya concerning the discovery, only some of which I have mentioned here.

Over the years there have been several notrious incidents of intentional deception in paleontology, the 18th century “lying stones” of  Johann Bartholomeus Adam Beringer and the early 20th century Piltdown Man fake immediately come to mind.  However, those were done maliciously in an attempt to destroy the professional career of a scientific rival.  The Dancing Worms of Turkana is a totally different beast, one done in good humor and with precautions taken to not do any real damage.  Like many movies in the 1930s. the closing scene has everyone laughing together side by side.

Artwork of Tullimonstrum, the state fossil of Illinois, can be seen emblazoned on the sides of U-Haul trucks and trailers.


Scientist's views: Johnson  and Richardson 1969 (below)

Patterson and the Worm: Nash 1968 (below)

Johnson, R.G, and Richardson, E.G. 1969. Pennsylvanian invertebrates of the Mazon Creek area, Illinois: The morphology and affinities of Tullimonstrum. Fieldiana: Geology  12 (8): 119–149.

Nash E.G. 1968.  The quest for the dancing worm. Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural History 39(4): cover + 4-6

Kloss, G. June 18, 1968. The Great Dancing Worm Hoax. The Milwaukee Journal.  

Richardson, E.G. 1966. Wormlike Fossil from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois. Science 151(3706): 75-76 

Richardson, E.S. The tully monster. Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural History 37(7): cover + 4-6.  July 1966 <>

Rory, E Scumas (Richardson, E.G.)  1969. The Dancing Worm of Turkana. Vanishing Press: 27 pp.